The back end, developer side of databases
and search engines are something not many people know about. Many people do not
realize all of the elements that go into organizing information into databases
and search engines. Users are used to typing in what they are looking for and
getting instant results without a second thought to all of the algorithms and
processes that librarians and researchers use to make information searchable
and easy to find. Bates (1999) calls this the paradigm of information science
that is under the water line. This is part of being a librarian that people do
not see, the forming and organizing of information.

Librarians use bibliographic objectives to
help people find what they are looking for. There are five types of
bibliographic objectives that are used when looking for an entity in the
library. They are finding, collocating, choice, acquisition, and navigation
objectives (Svenonius,
2000).
First you have to identify what you are trying to look for, for example, I want
to look for a book about the history of unicorns. Next would come the
collocating objective. This is not something that users have to deal with
directly, this is more of how the database is set up. The collocating objective
hopes that the database will pull up all of the relevant sources that I am
looking for and only the relevant items that I am looking for. Keeping with my
unicorn example, I search “unicorns” in a database and I get my results. The
database finds 42 books in the library about unicorns, so the next step is the
choice objective, which focuses on the preferences of the patron such as format
and content. I then have to narrow my search and find out which entities are
non-fiction and include the history of unicorns in a physical book format. This
brings my search results to only three books in the library. The acquisition
objective follows this and involves locating and obtaining the items you have
found in the database. This can mean going to the shelves, downloading an
e-book, ordering the item from another library, etc… Since I am only looking
for physical books in the library I am currently in, I am able to walk over to
the shelf and find the three non-fiction books about unicorns. The great part
about being a librarian is that you have the talent of finding useful
information to help others learn about so many subjects, but you don’t have to
know anything about that subject to do it (Bates, 1999). Librarians don’t need
to know anything about unicorns to help patrons learn about unicorns.
The connection between the principle of
least effort and bibliographic objectives is that when creating databases and
organizing information, librarians have to keep in mind that people are not
going to go to great lengths to find exactly what they need and the best source
for it, they are going to find what pops up first in their search and call it a
day. Libraries and information organizers have to adapt to how people search
for information. This means that information needs to be organized in a way
that allows the best possible sources to be easy to find. This can include
tagging items and articles with appropriate keywords and making sure that items
are properly cataloged so they are able to be found. If I search unicorns and a
book about dragons is in the first few results, there is an error in how the
item was cataloged and the database needs to be updated because the collocation
objective was not met. Dragons may be related to unicorns in that they are both
part of mythology, but that is not what I am looking for at the moment.
References
Bates, M. J. (1999). The invisible
substrate of information science. Journal of the American
Society for Information Science J.
Am. Soc. Inf. Sci.,
50(12), 1043-1050. doi:10.1002/(sici)1097-4571(1999)50:123.0.co;2-x
Mann, T. (1993). The Principle of
Least Effort. In Library Research Models: A Guide to
Classification, Cataloging, and
Computers (pp.
91-101). New York City, IL: Oxford University Press.
Svenonius, E. (2000). Bibliographic
Objectives. In The Intellectual Foundations of Information
Organization (pp. 15-30). Cambridge, MA: MIT
Press.
No comments:
Post a Comment